You're sour grapes man, you wish it were you who wrote the article. Agreed. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. They're heavy, and expensive, but you can carry one lens instead of three, and can vary the compression and field of view to a significant degree - from nearly normal, to long portrait focal lengths. A lot of lenses today are better than anything money could buy in 1980. Add To Cart. I've recently started using 135 and 200mm lenses from the 1970s with my mono CCD and they've proven very useful for imaging large emission nebulae. I mainly use for head shot photography. It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. As you know, camera lenses come in varying focal lengths, apertures, and optical quality. I just got the Samyang version of this lens and used it with my Canon 3ti on a Skywatcher Star Adventurer. After a three-year hiatus, we've been at the return of the CP+ camera show in Yokohama, Japan. I've tested some of the old Pentax 6x7 lenses with a friend. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. The Nikon D810A, however, is modified for astrophotography out of the box. Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. Personally, I can't stand these circles, and I see them as VERY distracting.Lots of fads come and go, and this is just another one of these fads that some photographers are obsessed with. The only thing that could possibly make this better would be to add IS. The 135mm f2 is by all accounts one of their better and more reliable lenses however I believe the chance of a defective lens is lower with the Canon. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. Is it possible to get good results on a Baader filter modifed Canon 450D and a good telephoto lens, or do I need to get a good APO? (purchased for $970), reviewed March 17th, 2011 CANON LENS FOR ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. Several days ago another member posted a stunning telephoto image of the Snake Nebula, Barnard 72, taken with a Canon lens which costs $12,000. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. With weather sealing this would be a 10. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. Below, are a few examples of astrophotography images Ive taken with lenses of varying focal lengths. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed January 1st, 2007 CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. My point is that we must never lose the joy of photography. Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. One is the price, which starts around $800 for the smallest units, and rapidly climbs into thousands of dollars for larger apertures. Often need f2.2 to f2.8 to gain sufficient DOF for human subjects. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. Hey Trevor, great article! In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. And because you can shoot between F/2 and F/4, plenty of light reaches the sensor in a relatively short exposure. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. I have had a blast with a samyang, but a used 135mm f2.8 is VERY . This lens has only two drawbacks. Tiring. The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. But this lens changed my mind. I just wish this lens had IS for low light and portraits with flash. (purchased for $900), reviewed August 22nd, 2008 Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM (72mm filters, 0.9m/3' close-focus, 25.0 oz./708g, about $1,035.) thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. I actually have to walk 1/2 way up the stairs to be able get folk in the frame. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. Light falloff (vignetting) gets pretty high (0.73 EV wide open, but drops to 0.3 EV at f/2.8, and only 0.17 EV at f/4. Of the 150 images I considered fit to publish, only 4 were made with the 135. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. Lots of wet blankets around here. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. Great reach for street shots. A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. Several functions may not work. (purchased for $845), reviewed November 16th, 2005 This gives me the power of 162x, which is barely sufficient for my 420mm fl APO astrograph at full camera resolution. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. The Andromeda Galaxy using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens. See the full-size version on Astrobin. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. If you own an EOS Camera - It's a no Brainer, Buy one Great post; thanks for the detailed information. Still, what a time to be an enthusiast/photog, so many nice options. I am no stranger to the full manual control of this lens, for both aperture and focus. Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens for Canon SLR Cameras - Amazon.com In excellent condition, this lens retails for around $200. It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. this lens typifies modern design being confined to sharpness, colour & bokeh. And in their task to get that blurry background, they most often throw their main subject out of focus and/or to focus for anything else in the photograph that would make it, and end results are just "gear porn". If the telescope mount is precisely aligned to the celestial north pole, unguided exposures of one to two minutes are possible. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). the lens is built strong, very strong. When i check a F stop chart, i see 15 stops if i count the main, and the secondary ones: 2, 2.4, 2.8, 3.3, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.7, 8, 9.5, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22. I already did some trials with the Samyang 12mm lens. No telephoto lens, and no apochromat, is sufficiently corrected to accomodate such a wide spectral range. reviewed August 2nd, 2017 however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. One way to combat potential soft images and chasing perfect focus all night is to stop the lens down to F/2.8 or even F/4. Well, after lugging that lens around for years, I'm experimenting with adding the 135L back to my kit. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. The extremes are 2 and 22. On the 135/2 all you've got is the bare metal. For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. It is fantastically sharp, can make beautiful blurred backgrounds and bokeh, and is both light and inexpensive for what you get. Shoot shiny metal at a wide aperture and you'll see some very extreme purple fringing. Definitely now on my to-buy list. Finally, although we don't explicitly test for it, we have to note that this lens' bokeh (rendering of out-of-focus objects) is really excellent as well. A promising start, no doubt, but not a master yet! Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). I mount it on my APS-C camera and the focal length literally becomes 216 mm, which is too tight. I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. Back in 1999, Sony released the F505, their first digital camera with a Carl Zeiss lens. The lens arrived next day, less than 24 hours after I hit the order button. Beautiful portrait lens. Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. The aperture ring is marked with each f-stop, and you need to manually click through F/2 F/22 and watch the blades do their work. If experience has taught me anything, its that the practical, pain-free equipment that gets the most use under the stars. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. It's a trade off. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. p.s. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! (cont. Hi Thomas As far as I know, the Nikon D500 is not modified for astrophotography out of the box (it includes a built in IR cut filter that blocks much of the 656nm wavelength). I read and bought it. Wonderful, smooth bokeh. Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses. Because of some residual chromatic aberration even with the aperture stop, the best focus lies not where the star image is the smallest, but rather just slightly away from infinity, at the point where the star image barely begins to enlarge. The Image Sensor Frame tool lets you enter in the size of your camera sensor, and focal length of your lens (or telescope) to display a frame over the star map. It is a heavy lens. Let's dig in. Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. Sure, not all 135mm lenses are lightweightSigma's new 135mm F1.8 is rather heavy at 1130gbut if you look at the Samyang 135mm F2, which is pretty much flawless optically, it weighs only 830g. If You can afford it, buy it! it is crisp, fast, and awsome. Lensrentals.com - Rent Lenses and Cameras from Canon, Nikon, Olympus It seems they are now quite comparable in quality to prime lenses. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. What's it got and what's it like to use? I am telling them - don't! Fast. A series of such images can be digitally stacked to produce excellent results. No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. The 5D's larger pixels also make chromatic aberration somewhat lower at most apertures. The best ones listed below serve well with a one stop reduction, and some require two or even three stops. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/284303834/. It seems lazy to me. $449.00. The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. Of my last 3500 shots only 62 were made with the 135 f/2. Nice article for beginners.It's all in the eyes of the beholder. Why would I want a 135/2.0 lens when I have a 135/1.8? It focuses within a blink of an eye, instantly. The rest are relatively uncreative, and just seem lame to me. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. Samyang 135 f/2 ED astrophotography modifications - astrojolo The only downside with that lens is that it is manual focus, which might not be suitable for photographing sports or children. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). $581.00 for 7 days. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. I got my first 400 around 50 years ago, and I must say that each step forward feels like a revolution, for a while. The 135L is half the weight of the 70-200 2.8IS. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. A Bargain, very competively priced Oh and it's stabilised. you can see here a lot of photos mostly shot with the f/4 version. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. The extent of this influence lies mainly in photographer's perception and creativity.As all arts photography may serve given needs due to numerous reasons with the resulting integrity of the work not necessarily suggesting art.The photographic gear (from lens cleaning tissues up to s/w) is just the tool(s) of a photographer in order to produce its work. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. I found with the 70-200 made me lazy. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. Many lenses lose their appeal after time, but not this one. The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. Are you really using 135 a lot? Is there a reason why a 135/2.8 or even 135/4 would provide significantly different images? I enjoied the use of this lens many years before the DSLR. Whos Afraid of a Phantom: Istar Phantom 140mm F/6.5, that is? As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount from Rokinon is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and all medium telephoto applications. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. image quality wise it is by far one the sharpest lenses ive ever used. USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. This looks to be an excellent lens with fantastic results. I have a 135mm f2.8 lens I've used for wide DSOs but mostly I use 200mm. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. I have used the canon 70-200 f2.8L ii and also the 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L with excellent results. Would you recommend a collar/support for the lens? (purchased for $900), reviewed December 14th, 2006 This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. How well do Fujifilm's film simulations match up to their film counterparts? The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. All lenses mentioned below are adaptable to Canon EOS cameras with slim EOS adapters which allow the lenses to focus just slightly past infinity. Im so new to all of this so thank you for your insightful and educational posts. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. Canon 135 mm is really E X T R A O R D I N A R Y lens. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. I used Canon's 135 f/2 for ten years. I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. Be careful with the focus. Interesting that ancient, low-tech (no ED glass, no special coatings) non-apo telephotos could produce decent results compared to something modern. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 Weight. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. The full extent of the relationship between Rokinon and Samyang is unknown to me, but the packaging on my lens says Technology by Samyang Optics. Everyone should have one? In an effort to save money, Id like to start using a Canon 80D that we already own to start picking targets and imaging. An h-alpha filter would still be useful for your D500, but much more so if it were modified! Does this work well with any of the 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.0x Teleconverters (extenders / barlows)? Andysea, those are great images on your website. fast, sharp wide open, excellent bokeh, value for money, very fast, sharp, gorgeous background blur, world class lens. There are only a handful of foolproof strategies for making a great photograph. Or just get a zoom that is 24-200mm and you are covered. I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. The logic of this article can be applied to a 200/2.8 as well. Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens (Canon EF) - B&H Photo
Prairie Dogs As Pets Pros And Cons,
Wisconsin Technical College Salaries 2020,
Motorcycle Track Days Los Angeles,
Used 1858 Conversion Cylinder,
Who Played Mrs Joyce On Longmire,
Articles C